Skip to main content
Acquisition of vacant lots for vendors proposed
Meeting with President on today
By Desiree Jodah
Stabroek News
October 10, 2000



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Councillors of the Georgetown Municipality yesterday passed a motion to seek government's leave to acquire vacant lots, particularly in Water, America and Regent streets for vendors, who have been barred from selling on Regent Street, to ply their trade. The motion tabled by A Good and Green Guyana (AGGG) councillor, Llewellyn John, was passed even as a meeting requested by President Bharrat Jagdeo with members of the Mayor and City Council (M&CC) and vendors is expected to be held at 1500 hrs today.

The M&CC, on September 30, dismantled all stalls belonging to Regent Street vendors following the dismissal of an injunction which the vendors had obtained against City Hall. The injunction had prevented the M&CC from removing the vendors. Vendors since then have been involved in peaceful protest marches around the city.

According to the motion, "where provided by the Municipal District Council's Act Chapter 28:01, that the M&CC is empowered with the leave of the Minister responsible for Local Government, to use powers of compulsory acquisition by notice to treat where land is required for public purpose."

The motion noted that the current situation facing the municipality to find accommodation for vending as a result of the lack of space could be eased by the acquisition of sites in the Stabroek and Lacytown areas. Councillors voted in favour of the municipality seeking the leave of central government to acquire vacant sites, more particularly in Water, America and Regent streets to alleviate the vendor problem.

Councillors were involved in a heated debate for and against the motion, with AGGG councillor Harold `Lightweight' Kissoon "smelling a rat" and PPP/Civic councillor Randolph Harris burning anything that was on his property without his consent.

The AGGG was supported by all but one of the PNC councillors. Mayor Hamilton Green voted against the motion; one of the three PPP/C councillors abstained; one PNC councillor did not respond. In all 15 councillors voted in favour of the motion, four against and two abstained.

John, arguing in favour of the motion, listed a plot of land at the corner of Regent and Camp streets; land belonging to one Bagh Khan in the Stabroek Market area; open spaces at the corner of Croal Street and Avenue of the Republic (next to Satro's General Store); Longden and Croal streets; and the former Bettencourt's Store site on Water Street.

Harris argued that there was a lot of ambiguity in the motion. He said the council could not take away people's property and give it to vendors. He said if it was his property he would burn everything. Harris opined that no minister would agree to take away people's property for vending and that only the state could compulsorily acquire property.

Kissoon said that for years he had been quoting the section for compulsory acquisition, but no one listened. He said among suggestions he had made were that facilities be built for vendors at the corner of Main and New Market streets. He had also suggested that the museum be removed from its present location and housed at Castellani House and facilities put in that location for vendors. Kissoon declared: "I smell a rat. Political confrontation is the rat I smell."

PPP/C councillor Prabhudial Sattan also thought that the motion was not clear. He said the motion did not specify the open spaces in Lacytown. He questioned how many vendors could be accommodated at the vacant lot at the corner of Camp and Regent streets. Sattan was also against the acquisition of people's property for vendors to ply their trade.

Oscar Clarke, leader of the PNC side, in supporting the motion saw it as providing an ample opportunity for pre-empting the meeting with President Jagdeo. He said the motion was one of the many ways in which to tackle the vendor problem.

Describing the vendors as an "army of small business people," trying to make a living, Clarke said there was a need to revisit all options. He pointed out that vending on the pavements traditionally took place in the commercial zone. He said it was time for serious action to be taken to provide the vendors with an opportunity to make a decent living.

AGGG's T. Anson Sancho thought the motion was unnecessary. He opined that the compulsory acquisition of private property would pose a problem for City Hall. Sancho was also worried about the meeting with President Jagdeo. He wondered whether the President would try to persuade the council to adopt the Prime Minister's proposals, which had been dubbed by Green as "nonsensical."

He suggested that the team meeting the President should arrive at a conclusion about its position before the meeting. Sancho said he did not think the President was inviting the council to discuss any new proposals and if he did, he (Sancho) would personally congratulate him.

Green described the motion as having been prepared in great haste. He said it made dangerous suggestions pertaining to open spaces. Green said he had no problem with the philosophy of the motion, but that it made a presumption of what public purpose may or may not be. The mayor, reminding of the Town Plan for the development of Georgetown, said it was wrong and unfortunate that open spaces were only seen as being needed for vending. He said that as a group, council should not compromise on open space for historical purposes, sports and other recreational facilities. He said there was competition for space.

John argued that the motion was being misunderstood. He explained that compulsory acquisition was the last step, as "notice to treat," meant that notices would be sent to owners of the properties asking them to meet the council to discuss their intentions pertaining to their property. He said owners could lease their properties or agree to temporary use. However, if within 14 days there was no response from owners, the council could go ahead with compulsory acquisition with the consent of the subject minister.

Deputy Mayor Robert Williams expressed concern about members of the delegation representing Regent Street vendors. According to Williams, spokesperson for the vendors Mansa Amin, has been allocated a stall number one in Orange Walk and has been occupying it since 1997. He also named Valerie Hinds, Donald Clarke and Elvina Clarke, who he claimed had stalls on Orange Walk and in Bourda Market.

Meanwhile, the M&CC's legal department is contemplating a course of action pertaining to what was described as "deprecate and snide remarks" allegedly made by Sunrise Show host Clem David on Channel Six pertaining to the vendor issue. According to the M&CC, David allegedly made the remarks against the mayor, the deputy mayor and the town clerk.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luke-Sancho

It is a given not every person surnamed Luke and/or members of the kinship of Luke are descendants of Sancho. The aim of this exercise is to identify the members of the kinship of Sancho. This effort is focused primarily on the immediate relatives of Mrs. Adelaide Sancho-Luke. However, it would be totally illogical not to recognize the possibility that there are likely other links among the people of Luke and Sancho, other than that of David Luke and Adelaide Sancho. This is part of the up-hill task of accounting for all of the members of the kinship of Sancho, as accurately as humanly possible. Your input will be greatly appreciated. You are hereby asked to share your knowledge of our people, and/or to point us to sources of information; whereby persons connected to the primary ancestor will be identified. Thanks for your time, tolerance and cooperation. Whenever you have pertinent information will please share with researchers? Email: nabaclisman@gmail.com PRIMARY SURNAME: LUKE - The

Brick Walls

 Contact :- childrenofsancho@gmail.com Perhaps, the future generations of Sancho researchers will move this process forward in a radical environment resembling that of the ancestors of Sancho prior to the beginnings of the seventeenth century AD.   It’s likely the future generations of Sancho researchers will be able to access information which is not currently available. This Sancho hopes the future generations of Sancho researchers will vindicate his efforts. This Sancho hopes the future generations of Sancho researchers will pay homage to the integrity, Sancho ancestral heritage. He also hopes his fortitude, integrity; sincerity and the love for his Sancho biology will be appreciated and lauded by the future generations of Sancho researchers, and Sancho people, generally, most especially the DNA Sancho. Perhaps, more than enough time efforts has been exhausted exposing the distraction the reprehensible opinions of Kenneth Joyce Robertson and his fictitious account- purporting

William Sancho, at Buxton, 1880s - 1890s?

 Are you aware of William Sancho, ca. 1880s - 1890s?  He was convicted of numerous  petty criminal activities, Old William Sancho certainly had it rough. obviously, this Sancho sympathize with his sufferings. However, because of the colonial records this Sancho became aware of the human experience. And for that truth and reality this Sancho is extremely grateful, Bit alas, their is no genealogical information available in print. If  Old William was birthed before 1869; perhaps the names of his immediate relates are available in the district.