Skip to main content
Ballot box opened after close of polls
--elections petition hearing learns

Stabroek News
November 4, 1999


The ongoing elections petition hearing yesterday learned that a ballot box had been opened by a group of persons on Elections Day, after the close of polls, in order to check on the material inside.

The court presided over by Justice Claudette Singh, was also told by a former presiding officer (PO) that the same ballot box had earlier been taken from her at the Sparendaam Police Station and that she had next seen it about half an hour later at the Beterverwagting Education Office where the opening took place.

Jacqueline Barclay's testimony came under cross-examination by Peter Britton, SC, counsel for the petitioner Esther Perreira, and after she had faced examination by Hubert Rodney, counsel for the Chief Elections Officer (CEO).

Barclay had earlier testified that she had been appointed to serve as PO at a private residence in South Better Hope and that, in the course of her duties, she had prepared a poll book and statement of poll (SOPs).

She said that her SOP, which allocated the votes, had been signed and that none of the scrutineers representing political parties at her station had queried this allocation of votes.

She told the court that after the close of poll, a group of people which included policemen, had come to her station and taken her, along with her ballot box and other elections material to the Sparendaam Police Station.

She told Rodney that at the station, the box was taken from her and she was then taken to Beterverwagting where she handed the deputy returning officer an envelope containing the keys to her ballot box and her SOP.

Under cross-examination, Barclay conceded to Britton that she had not been trained to leave her ballot boxes at the police station. However, she admitted that she could not remember exactly what she had been told she was to do with the ballot box.

She recalled that at Sparendaam a vehicle resembling a container had been on the public road outside the station and that it was in this vehicle that her ballot box had been placed. However, she explained that she had not put the box in the container. According to Barclay, a group of persons whom she did not know, had come up to her and, without signing for the box, had taken it away.

She also told the court that at the time the box was being loaded into the container, she had been in a mini-bus on the other side of the road.

She said that at BV she was able to identify her ballot box among a number of others, which had been taken into the office.

Yesterday, the court also heard testimony from Vidawattie Ramkishur and June Sancho. Ramkishur told the court that lack of a six-digit stamp at her polling booth at Lusignan Primary had forced her to open her polling station 45 minutes late.

She told the court that to compensate she had closed her station at 1815 hrs, extending the deadline beyond the prescribed 1800 hrs.

Asked by Britton whether, by law, she was empowered to do this, the witness, after scanning a PO manual, conceded that she was not.

Britton then had her observe that, with the 15-minute extension, she had kept her polling station open for only 11 and half hours, 30 minutes less than the 12 hours she had said she was trying to make up. Ramkishur explained that at around 1330 hrs that day, all the voters on her list had already voted at the station and that the decision to close at 1815 had been made by herself, the political party scrutineers present and others.

Britton summed up the situation by suggesting that she was part of a group that decided to change the law. The witness did not disagree with this assessment.

Next to testify was Sancho, who identified a poll book tendered in court by Rodney as hers.

She went on to tell the court that a clerk of her DRO had gone to her polling station and that she had accompanied this person to the local office at Triumph. Before this testimony, however, Sancho had to explain to Britton why on a document listing POs, she was listed as June Peters. Her explanation was that at the time, she was unmarried.

The elections petition hearing is expected to continue tomorrow.

The petition is being brought by Esther Perreira, who is challenging the 1997 elections on the grounds that the process was so flawed that it cannot be said to accurately reflect the will of the electorate.


Popular posts from this blog

Who are Descendants of Clarence Sancho and Mary (David) Sancho?

Are you aware of Samuel David and Mary (David)Sancho of Golden Grove? Samuel David was a Sergeant of British Guiana Police Force.  Samuel David departed in 1945 or 1946. Mary David and Clarence Sancho were married. The couple had about seven children. Much respect to Wainwright for pointing pieces of information on the David and Sancho union  to me some 43 years ago. Who must I consult to acquire the  knowledge  relative to David family  especially the descendants of  grand Uncle Clarence  Sancho?

John Baptiste Sanco

On Friday, March 20, 2009, I visited the New York Public Library, Humanities and Social Sciences (Research Division). I accessed copies of the Trinidad and Tobago year books for the years 1921 thru 1935. I paid particular attention to the obituary, which is found immediately following local events in the publications.

I made notes of the data of persons with the surnames of interest to me. At this instance I cannot locate the entire documentation.
In the yearbook for the year 1929 data is found telling readers that Mrs. Elizabeth Sancho, 92 years old died on November 30, 1928. I suppose she was born in either 1835 or 1836.  (perhaps, wife of John Sancho??)
In other issues of the yearbook entries listed below are included.
Mrs. Rupert Sancho died November 13, 1924 (Possibly, Chinese-Trinidadian)
John Baptiste Sanco died February 17, 1920. (I believe data will prove this John Sancho to be perhaps too young to be an uncle of Lambert Tuckness Sancho, for I am of the impression Sancho male…

Bertrand Aaran Abrams (1929-1969). An Unsung Guyanese Patriot

Bertrand Aaran Abrams (1929-1969).  An Unsung Guyanese Patriot “On July 21, 1954, the plaintiff was convicted by the magistrate of the East Demerara Judicial District for being on June 10, 1954, in possession of prohibited publications contrary to s. 4 of the Undesirable Publications (Prohibition of Importation) Ordinance, and fined $25 or one month’s imprisonment in default. The complaint was filed on June 30, 1954, and made returnable for July 7, 1954.”  “As the appeal against your conviction has been abandoned and the fine paid, I have to inform you that, in accordance with the ruling of the Law Officers for the breach of the emergency regulations, you are dismissed from your post as a Cl. II Assistant Teacher in Cane Grove Anglican School as from 11th January, 1955.”  - Joseph H. Jones, Manager, Cane Grove Anglican School. Opinion – I have no recollection of anyone telling Bertrand Abrams was fired as a school teacher. And for whatever the reasons offered by the colonial authorit…